Ba vor asum em Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 (edited) marriage is for ONLY men and women. The main meaning of marriage is to bring children to the world. No gay couple can have children. But still state of Massachusetts USA, is the first state that passed the law to "them" become married legally. This is very BAD. What do you think? marriage = MEN + WOMEN Edited February 5, 2004 by Ba vor asum em Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TS133T Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Well, it's still under question. Lots of people are againts it, even our beloved President Bush:) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ba vor asum em Posted February 5, 2004 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Well, it's still under question. Lots of people are againts it, even our beloved President Bush:) he better be!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YanaA Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Ba vor asum em, I still miss some points in your post, although I got the overall meaning. What did you mean by MIRAGE? Is it marriage? And what did state of Massachusetts STEAL? If you are really talking about gay marriage, as far as I know, state of Vermont was the first to accept it legally a couple of years ago. So Massachusetts is not the first. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ba vor asum em Posted February 5, 2004 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Ba vor asum em, I still miss some points in your post, although I got the overall meaning. What did you mean by MIRAGE? Is it marriage? And what did state of Massachusetts STEAL? If you are really talking about gay marriage, as far as I know, state of Vermont was the first to accept it legally a couple of years ago. So Massachusetts is not the first. I heard it in news. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Yesenya Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 marriage is for ONLY men and women. The main meaning of marriage is to bring children to the world. No gay couple can have children. But still state of Massachusetts USA, is the first state that passed the law to "them" become married legally. This is very BAD. What do you think? marriage = MEN + WOMEN It’s ok, Canada has already passed that law, revoked it later, than is trying to pass it again. I mean if they want to get married, it costs not more than $600 to go to Amsterdam, and get married over there. I mean I know it’s odd, but they already live together, they can adopt kids, and trust me they have the right to exchange their vows in church, because most of the priests in the US are gay , so all they need are benefits. I am not for it, but they’ve got so many privileges already, it’s hard to stop them now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Investigator Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 Leviticus 18:22 You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act. 20:13 If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TS133T Posted February 12, 2004 Report Share Posted February 12, 2004 (edited) "The assembly-line nuptials began with longtime lesbian activists Phyllis Lyon, 79, and Del Martin, 83, who were hurriedly issued a married license and were wedded just before noon by City Assessor Mabel Teng in a closed-door civil ceremony at City Hall. The two have been a couple for 51 years." http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl...ys_and_Lesbians Ешё говорят почему некоторие любят собак больше чем людей. Edited February 12, 2004 by TS133T Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.