Jump to content

Libertas

Forumjan
  • Posts

    279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Libertas

  1. What? It doesn't get your blood boiling?
  2. Two Different National Leaders Give Exactly Identical Speech Speeches by the leaders of Canada and of Australia. 2 days apart. Continents apart. 2003 - before the invasion of Iraq. Identical texts !!!! One of the most amazing examples of media management controlling national governments. Here are the 2003 speeches given by the leaders of Australia and Canada on the subject of Iraq. Separated by 2 days. The text of both of these speeches are exactly identical. Word for word. These speeches were given before the invasion of Iraq happened. Clear evidence of the control of national governments. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK7g8...layer_embedded#
  3. Low level Masons are just like Low Level Members of Knights of Columbus. Knights of Malta for the elite and the Knights of Columbus for the useful idiots.
  4. The esoteric all-male group known as Freemasonry (or Masonry) has been controversial for many years, and has been connected to homosexuality by a number of researchers. "Why?" you may ask. Albert Pike was Sovereign Grand Commander of the (Masonic) Scottish Rite's Southern Jurisdiction from 1859-1891. He published a book called Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in 1871, of which there were several subsequent editions. Citations from Pike's magnum opus will be featured here. MASONS ARE BEING DUPED Like other esoteric groups and some fraternities, the Masons have secret doctrines and initiations. The homosexual agenda is hidden from the membership. Now, as Pike mysteriously put it, Freemasonry "conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled; to conceal the Truth, which it calls Light, from them, and to draw them away from it. Truth is not for those who are unworthy or unable to receive it, or would pervert it." Instead of Masons explicitly spelling out their secrets, they only obliquely impart them. Pike states: "What the Chiefs of the Order really believed and taught, is indicated to the Adepts by the hints contained in the high degrees of Free-masonry." Pike again: "The symbols and ceremonies of Masonry have more than one meaning. They rather conceal than disclose the Truth. They hint it only." More: "We have hints, and not details," "hints of the true objects and purposes of the Mysteries." (The "Mysteries" are secret Masonic "Truths" and secret initiatory rituals.) Pike speaks in enigmas because he can only hint at Masonic secrets. Masons take oaths not to reveal the group's secrets. Upper-level Masons even keep secrets from lower-level Masons. According to Pike, a lower-level Mason "is intentionally misled by false interpretations [of Masonic symbols]. It is not intended that he shall understand them [the symbols]; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry." Lower-level Masons are just dupes being used by the upper-level ones, the so-called "Princes of Masonry." HOMOSEXUALITY Now, to direct our attention to the connection between Masonry and homosexuality: Are Masons using their power and influence to try to spread homosexual "values"? In the following enigmatic words, Pike seems to be saying that Mason [adepts] engage in homosexual oral sex. He states that an initiate "commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life....Hence the significance of the phallus." As is his wont, Pike does not explain these words. For example, he does not spell out what he means by "this mysterious passion." But elsewhere in the book he twice notes that phallic worship is a part of their "Ancient Mysteries." Not only does homosexual sex apparently play a role in Masonry, but homosexual orgies evidently do too. Pike, speaking in general of a newly initiated member, says: "he mingles with the crowd of Initiates, and, crowned with flowers, celebrates with them the holy orgies." Needless to say, Pike does not define "holy orgy." In at least two other locations in his book he mentions that orgies are associated with Masonic initiations. [Pike has a reputation for indulging in debaucheries as well as Satanic butchery. HM] Freemasonry is still a force in America and the world. The fact that this group is evidently biased against women (who cannot join the group) and biased in favor of homosexual relationships should not go unmentioned, and neither should the very real possibility that this group is using its influence to try to impose pro-homosexual "values" on the public.
  5. Dr. Stanley Monteith. It is impossible to understand the unfolding of world events without the information contained in this video. What was the origin of the Council on Foreign Relations, and what is its relationship to Freemasonry, Theosophy, Socialism and Communism? This video is felt by many researchers to be the best single source of information on the movements working to create a New World Order. No researcher, or seeker for the truth should be without a copy of this highly acclaimed presentation. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...04516923817439# The Brotherhood of Darkness READ THE BOOK http://www.amazon.com/Brotherhood-Da...der_1575580632
  6. Chris are you serious about what you posted? Really dude that is bit far-fetched don't you think?
  7. You all do it.. "Psyberbation" "Psy" as in mental, "Psyber" as in cyber (electronic), "bation" as in masturbation -- "Psyberbation" is the copulation of mental ideas over an electronic medium.
  8. The Turkish government has reportedly angered Turkish-German politicians by inviting them to an Istanbul conference and then urging them to resist political and social integration in their adopted homeland At the meeting last month, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan urged Turks living in foreign countries to take out citizenship of the new homelands – not to integrate, but rather to become more politically active, according to the website of news magazine Der Spiegel. Ali Ertan Toprak, deputy chairman of the Alevi community in Germany, told the magazine government representatives had said: “We have to inject European culture with Turkish.” Erdogan told the meeting countries that did not allow dual citizenship violated basic rights and also likened Islamophobia to anti-Semitism. Participants told Spiegel that Erdogan repeated elements of his widely criticised speech in Cologne in 2008 in which he said: “Assimilation is a crime against humanity.” The invitation to politicians and religious leaders of Turkish descent included lunch in a five-star hotel in Istanbul and offered to cover their travel costs. The title of the meeting was: “Wherever one of our countrymen is, we are there too.” About 1,500 Turks from several European countries attended, including a Belgian MP and representatives of companies and NGOs. The meeting was organised by Erdogan’s reigning Justice and Development Party (AKP), which has conservative-religious leanings and has been criticised for pulling the country away from its secular tradition. Faruk Celik, a minister in Erdogan's cabinet, described German politicians as “my honourable parliamentarians” and described Erdogan as “our Prime Minister.” German politicians and religious representatives of Turkish descent were shocked by the brazen political lobbying and were sharply critical of Ankara. “It was an absolutely clear lobbying event by the Turkish government,” said Ali Ertan Toprak. He said he was appalled by how often the Turkish government had said Turkish-Germans should represent the interests of Turkey. “If opponents of (Turkey’s) EU entry from the (European) Union had been there, they would have got a whole lot of material for their argument,” Toprak said. Canan Bayram, a Turkish-born Greens member of the Berlin city parliament, said she had travelled to the conference as the integration spokeswoman for her party but had insisted on paying for herself. “It was important for me to make clear that as a German MP I was not financed by the Turkish government,” she said. Former Social Democrats member of the European parliament and businessman Vural Öger said: “The Turkish government should worry about the interests of Turks in Turkey rather than trying to use Germans of Turkish descent as their messengers.” The Local ([email protected])
  9. English Freemen Standing In Court - The Takedown Begins! http://vimeo.com/10211543
  10. Ya voobshe tyt neprichom no soglasen polnostuy...
  11. Yep. So, why haven't the media picked up on it? Here's the big catch. Pharmaceutical companies probably won't invest in research into DCA because they won't profit from it. It's easy to make, unpatented and could be added to drinking water. Imagine, Gatorade with cancer control. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxXw...eature=related watch this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ij9P...layer_embedded# Sodium dichloroacetate offered by PureDCA.com has more than 99% purity. We make it using a sophisticated synthesis process. No organic solvents are used during the production. We are currently the only providers of sodium dichloroacetate, which is equivalent in quality to NaDCA used in Medicor Cancer Centres. http://puredca.com/ http://www.thedcasite.com/cgi/dcboard.cgi
  12. Norick (ili kak tam tebia esho) yesli dazhe i reshil vchom problema?
  13. Erdoğan's Armenian hostagesFont Size: Larger|Smaller Thursday, March 18, 2010Semih Idiz Angered at the Armenian “genocide” resolutions passed by a U.S. House of Representatives committee and the Swedish parliament, Turkey’s prime minister says he is prepared to deport 100,000 Armenians living illegally in Turkey if necessary. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan made the following remark in an interview with the BBC’s Turkish Service during a visit to London a few days ago: “Look, there are 170,000 Armenians in my country; 70,000 are my citizens. But we are not making a fuss over the remaining 100,000. So what will I do tomorrow? If necessary, I am going to tell these 100,000, ‘come on, back to your country.’ I will do this. Why? Because they are not my citizens. There is nothing that forces me to keep them in my country.” Erdoğan was referring to people who, due to the hardships in their own country, have somehow made their way to Turkey and are working here in order to be able to send their meager earnings back home to sustain their families or loved ones. This is not something that is alien to Turks, given that millions have had to travel to Western countries over the past decades, leaving home and hearth for the same reasons, many of them entering those countries illegally as well. Pressed on by his interviewer, Erdoğan made a feeble attempt later to backtrack by saying that he “was not referring to something that would be happening today or tomorrow, but only if necessary.” So innocent Armenians are again potential victims of ugly politicking. But Turkey is not the “hell-hole” in terms of human values that some Europeans and Armenian activists like to make it out to be. Erdoğan’s remarks were condemned by a significant number of Turkish politicians, columnists and other opinion makers as “inhumane,” “unjust” and “a violation of human rights.” Some columnists, such as Can Dundar of daily Milliyet, referred to a new “tehcir,” the term Turks use for the deportation of Armenians in 1915. Dundar indicated that Erdoğan’s remarks amount to saying that “100,000 Armenians are hostages, and if European parliaments don’t stop pressuring Turkey over the 1915 events, we will make them suffer.” Ergun Babahan of daily Star went the whole way and wrote, “If Hitler had been Turkish, we would also be denying the Holocaust today.” He added, in so many words, that that the spirit of Enver Paşa and his “Ittihadists” was alive and kicking in today’s Turkey. Erdoğan’s remarks are unconscionable, of course, and represent a slur to Turkey’s reputation. They are also seriously out of tune with Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s position on this issue. Davutoğlu was recently reported as telling the main opposition Republican People’s Party, or CHP’s, abrasive and Armenian-baiting deputy Canan Aritman that deporting illegal Armenians would be counterproductive, and leave Turkey facing international charges of “racism.” Naturally, one wonders how Davutoğlu feels after Erdoğan’s remarks. This brings us to the opposition’s position. As far as the ultranationalist Nationalist Movement Party, or MHP, is concerned, the reaction was predictable. Senior party members challenged Erdoğan, with apparent glee, to carry out his threat. “Why employ so many illegal Armenians when there are unemployed Turks?” was the attitude of Oktay Vural, a key name in the party. As for the supposedly “social democratic” main opposition CHP, it raised eyebrows again. Senior party members such as Aritman and Onur Oymen did not miss the chance to insist it was the CHP that had first suggested the Armenians should be deported (as if this is something that merits a medal). That was true, of course. The suggestion to deport all illegal Armenians from Turkey came initially from another senior CHP personality and a former ambassador to Washington, namely Şükrü Elekdağ. It must also be mentioned here that Oymen had insulted and said hurtful words in the recent past concerning Kurds also, when referring to the Dersim massacres of 1937-38 perpetrated by Turkish forces against rebellious Kurds. It seems, however, that the CHP leadership is trying to dissociate itself this time from the attitude of people such as Oymen, Elekdağ and Aritman – who once baited President Abdullah Gül by claiming he had Armenian blood in him that he was keeping secret. CHP spokesman Mustafa Ozyurek said in a statement that Erdoğan’s suggestion of deporting the Armenians was “wrong and discriminatory.” Much to the annoyance, no doubt, of the trio mentioned above, CHP leader Deniz Baykal also came out against Erdoğan’s suggestion. To use people who came to work in Turkey in this way was “a violation of human rights,” Baykal said. Undoubtedly referring to members of his own party, the CHP chief added that “individual opposition deputies may have their own views, which are not binding in the end,” but that it was “totally unacceptable” for the prime minister to come out with such a proposition. Whether Baykal really believes his own words, or simply did not want to end up in the position of having to support a suggestion by Erdoğan – his political enemy – is another question. Whatever the case, the CHP has to work overtime to not only prove its social democratic credentials, but also its humanistic ones. Finally, it must be said that Erdoğan’s figure of 100,000 illegal Armenians living and working in Turkey has not been corroborated by the Ministry of Labor or the Interior Ministry. The figures mentioned by Turkish and Armenian sources vary from 5,000 to 60,000. But whatever the figure may be, there is not one reported incident of trouble between Armenians working in Turkey and Turks. To the contrary, all the reports in the Turkish press about these people have been highly positive, indicating how Turks and Armenians can work, live and love (yes, there are even marriages taking place) together. But it makes no difference if the number of illegal Armenians is only 100. To turn innocent people, who have little to do with politics and are merely trying to eke out a living in difficult circumstances, into hostages for political considerations is morally reprehensible. Even members of Erdoğan’s Justice and Development Party, or AKP, have apparently understood this, and are now claiming, as Huseyin Celik – one of the party’s deputy leaders – did, that the prime minister “was only expressing Turkey’s good intentions” in saying what he said. Another leading AKP member, Suat Kınıklıoğlu, tried to repair the damage by arguing unconvincingly in a written statement that Erdoğan was “merely trying to show how tolerant Turkey was toward Armenians in Turkey,” Those who are prepared to buy this are welcome to do so. But it is clear from the reactions at home that the AKP can not fool everyone. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=p...ages-2010-03-18
  14. Norick y zapada svoix problem xvataet... Y nix seichas polno sotsialnix,ekonomicheskix problem. Nelzia ne nakavo nadetse krome sebia!
  15. Sorry off topic Chris do you remember the video I posted about John Harris with the title "It's an Illusion" ? One of the problems we are all facing is the fraudulent UCC/Admiralty Law and wording. Here is a great forum about Common Law vs Cooperate Law/UCC/Admiralty law. http://www.tpuc.org/forum/ It has all to do with WORDS and Legalese that the blood suckers use. We are all slaves and will be slaves unless we start to understand how "legal" system works. Here is a good example how to ignore fraudulent UCC/Commercial/Criminal/Civil legal system if you know THE REAL LAW!!! English Freemen Standing In Court - Council Tax Hearing - The Takedown Begins! http://vimeo.com/10211543 By the way you said something about John having very dark eyes? What did you mean by that? Ok on the topic now... Have you heard of the Tavistock Institute?
  16. Zdravstvy linka Problema tyt sovsem ne myshinax a Soctialnaya Enzhiniriya Social Engineering. Naprimer vi govarite chto sploshnie metrosexuali i golybie. A kak nashet zhenshin kotorie stradauyt nartsisismom i lezbianstvom? Kak nashet zhenshin kotorim promili mozgi s debilnoi idialogii femenizma? Dela tyt ne tolko v myzhikax a v zheninax tozhe... Zhenshini stali ne te no eto ne ix vina a vina tex institytov kotorie razrabativauyt raznie metodi pravlenia i tselesobrazno ryshat semia dav bezogranicheniie prava zhenshinam bez otvestvennosti za obshestva. Ya mogy skazats chto ochen mnogo zhenshin prosto stali syper egoistkami znaya chto mogyt zakonom slomats myzhika prodolzhauyt gybits kak svoix sinovei,otsov,bratev tak e vso obshestvo. Konechno ne vse zhenshini poddalis etim metodam pravlenia no mozhno skazats bolshenstvo prosto nechevo neponimauyt kak dvizhenie femenizma isportilo normalnie otnoshenie mezhdy myshinami i zhenshinami.. Ya ochen sovetyu vam i vsem prochitats vot ety knizhky tam pishetsa ochen mnogo faktov katorie mne kazhetsa zainteresyuyt lybovo zrelovo cheloveka... The Head of the Medusa — Overview http://fathersforlife.org/perseus/overview.htm The Head of the Medusa — Preface to Part 1; Chapter 1: Developments in the post-war world http://fathersforlife.org/perseus/medpref.htm <H3 class=pagetitle>The Head of the Medusa — Part 2: Of wars, gender-war and slander, of suffering, victory and honour</H3>Chapter 10: Truth and propaganda, men's and women's rights http://fathersforlife.org/perseus/medpart2.htm
  17. This guy knows what his is talking about!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qlr0qf0eTHU
  18. Vpolne vozmozhno ny veds chtobi Tyrtsia ne delala razrishenie idet is vishix instantsi miravovo pravitelstva...
  19. You are more or less spot on Sir Christopher... To tell you the truth I've noticed the lack of intellect right away with individuals you have mentioned... Advise taken...
  20. Ara ai chemo es inch ankap voraty bazares tanym? Miankamelem asym havaki kez martavari pahi y fantazianeret ko mech pai himar gexatsi.
×
×
  • Create New...