Libertas

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyLI8UVdTzQ * In 2005 and 2006, researchers at the Russian Academy of Sciences reported that female rats who were fed glyphosate-tolerant GM soya produced an excessive number of stunted pups with over 50% of them dying within three weeks. The other half were all sterile. This experiment was repeated several times with the same result [3]. * Between 2005 and 2006 in the Warangal district of Andhra Pradech in India, thousands of sheep died while grazing on residues from Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis, which is a type of bacteria which is toxic to some types of insects) cotton crops [4]. * In 2003, villagers in the Philippines' south suffered mysterious illnesses when a Monsanto Bt maize hybrid came into flower. At least five have died and many villagers tested positive for antibodies to the Bt protein while others still remain chronically ill [5]. * Between 2001 and 2002, 12 cows died in Hesse, Germany after consuming Syngenta GM maize (Bt176), while many others had to be slaughtered due to mysterious illnesses [6]. * From 2002 to 2005, researchers from four Italian universities published articles indicating that GM soya adversely affected pancreatic, hepatic (liver) and testicular cells in young mice [5]. * In 2005, Australian researchers at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Canberra reported that a harmless protein in beans (alpha-amylase inhibitor-1) caused inflammation in the lungs of mice and elicited increased dietary sensitivities to other proteins when transferred to peas [7]. * In 1998, researchers reported damage to every organ system of young rats who were fed GM potatoes containing snowdrop lectin [8]. In the same year, researchers in Egypt found analogous effects on the guts of mice fed Bt potato [9]. * In 2002, Aventis, later named Cropscience, submitted research to regulators in the U.K. reporting that chicken fed glufosinate-tolerant GM maize Chardon LL were twice as likely to die prematurely than chickens in the control group [10].

Codex Alimentarius... Vsem sovetyu posmatrets klip...

This is a fascinating documentary on WATER, I know that may sound boring, but I urge everyone to see it. You will not be disappointed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqaiD9G2usM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srezp...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IYyo...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54Dub...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xyu5s...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02sQE...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjd2e...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqnVD...eature=related

Morphicheski rezonans...

Government Runs with Lawyers and Marketeers, Plus Academia, They're Racketeers: http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/CTT...s_Mar102010.mp3

La Rouche interesni myzhik no mne bilobi interesno znats na kovo rabotaet on? Rothschilds Run British Rothschilds Run British Intelligence Operation into Russia through JRN and Diligence into Russia through JRN and Diligence March 13, 2010 (LPAC)—The main investment vehicle of the Rothschilds into Russia and Eastern Europe is JNR UK Ltd, an investment bank specializing in Eastern Europe and Russia. JNR stands for Jacob and Nathaniel Rothschild. Since Feb. 2003, Nathaniel Rothschild has been director of JRN. JNR has offices in Guernsey and Switzerland. The decision to run JNR out of its Swiss and Guernsey offices was made for tax reasons. Most of the revenues are derived from outside the UK. Through JNR the Rothschilds run their operations inside Russia and Eastern Europe in conjunction with the Russian oligarchy. As previously reported, Nathaniel Rothschild, as director of JRN, is the chief advisor to Russian aluminum oligarch Oleg Deripaska and Deripaska's Rusal, the world's largest aluminum company, in which Rothschild is also heavily invested. In addition to his relationship to Oleg Deripaska, Nathaniel Rothschild's best friend is another Russian billionaire oligarch, Roman Abramovich. An earlier operation, the Wellsian, Open Russia Foundation, which was set up by the Rothschilds with Russian oligarch Khodorkovsky, was shut down in 2006 by Russian authorities after Khodorkovsky's criminal conviction. Just prior to his arrest, Khodorkovsky attempted to hand over control of the Yukos oil company to Jacob Rothschild. Khodorkovsky had a "previously unknown arrangement" with Jacob Rothschild for the latter to take control of the former's Yukos stock in the event that the former could no longer "act as a beneficiary" of the shares. This effort to give control of Yukos to Rothschild was thwarted when, in 2004, the government of Russia seized and sold Yukos's largest production unit in compensation for large back tax bills. In 2007, JNR acquired a corporate intelligence firm called Diligence to coordinate its intelligence operations in Russia as well as elsewhere. Diligence was founded in 2000 by Nick Day, a former British special forces and MI5 operative, and ex-CIA agent Mike Baker, who no longer works for the company. Day reportedly saw an opening for a new business when British companies were entering emerging markets, targeting Russia. According to Handelsblatt, more than half of their roughly 100 employees are former members of an intelligence service. Michael Howard, former UK Conservative Party leader sits on Diligence's advisory board beside Judge William Webster, former director of the CIA and FBI, and Edward Mathias, managing director of Carlyle. Diligence describes itself as an intelligence-gathering and risk-management firm. It now boasts offices in London, Washington, Moscow and Hong Kong. http://larouchepac.com/node/13871 THE EMPIRE OF "THE CITY" (World Superstate) City of London + City of Vatican + City of columbia are the 3 independant states within states wich composes the empire of the city. The first is financial control over earth economy, the second is religion control over the earth and the third one is military control over the earth. Together they make the very unholy trinity which forms the egyptian pyramid that we can see on the back of the privately owned federal reserve note that is used as american dollar to maintain the colony in debt and under the Queen. Many people realize that this mystifying situation, in which an alleged democratic and self-governing nation is actually controlled against the will of the people, is a clear indication that there must be a very powerful and well-financed occult organization which plans and directs world affairs, and for lack of a more specific identification thie suspected secret organization is popularly referred to as the International Financiers, Banksters cartel or "The Crown corporation http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4675077383139148549#34m56s

City of London + City of Vatican + City of columbia are the 3 independant states within states wich composes the empire of the city. The first is financial control over earth economy, the second is religion control over the earth and the third one is military control over the earth. Together they make the very unholy trinity which forms the egyptian pyramid that we can see on the back of the privately owned federal reserve note that is used as american dollar to maintain the colony in debt and under the Queen. Many people realize that this mystifying situation, in which an alleged democratic and self-governing nation is actually controlled against the will of the people, is a clear indication that there must be a very powerful and well-financed occult organization which plans and directs world affairs, and for lack of a more specific identification thie suspected secret organization is popularly referred to as the International Financiers, Banksters cartel or "The Crown corporation http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4675077383139148549#34m56s

Barekamner inch profsouyz mrofzouyz? Lyrg hela tesek incha ashxarym katarvym... Profsouyz idea ona ne ploxaya no ksozheleniuy oni vse yzhe davno kypleni i rabotauyt ne na rabochix a na xoziaev...

Eto ozhidaets po vsemy miry tak chto tyt Amerika ne odna.... 20 Signs That The United States Is Rapidly Becoming A Totalitarian Big Brother Police State Once upon a time, the United States was a land of unparalleled freedom. The rest of the world envied the freedom that ordinary Americans had to think, say and do what they wanted. But all of that has changed. Now Americans have to fear that they will be tackled by a squad of security goons and dragged off to a detention facility somewhere if they spill a Pepsi on a flight attendant or take a few too many pictures of a public building. The United States used to be the polar opposite of totalitarian regimes like Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, but now America is rapidly becoming very much like them. Due to the fear of a boogeyman living in a cave somewhere or some guy with explosive powder in his underwear we are all being forced to give up our freedoms and learn to live in a Big Brother police state. But have things really changed so much that we have to give up all of the cherished freedoms that our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for? Haven't there always been fanatics and crazies and criminals out there? Why do we suddenly have to become so afraid of them? In the past, Americans would not let anyone make them live in fear. If some unbalanced individual did something bad, it wasn't the end of the world, was it? No, in the past Americans dusted themselves off and continued to live as free men and women. You see, when we live in fear and radically alter our way of life just to feel a little more secure, we lose. We have let someone else steal our freedom and our dignity. But now in the name of "security" all kinds of bizarre proposals have been implemented on the local, state and national levels. Somehow we think that if everything that we do is watched, monitored and analyzed we will all be safer somehow. Maybe we are safer and maybe we aren't, but we are certainly a whole lot less free. The following are 20 signs that the United States is rapidly becoming a totalitarian "Big Brother" police state.... #1) A new bill being pushed by Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman would allow the U.S. military to round up large numbers of Americans and detain them indefinitely without a trial if they "pose a threat" or if they have "potential intelligence value" or for any other reason the President of the United States "considers appropriate". #2) Lawmakers in Washington D.C. working to create a new immigration bill have decided on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card all American workers would be required to obtain. #3) Barack Obama is backing a plan to create a national database to store the DNA of people who have been arrested but not necessarily convicted of a crime. #4) Just to get on an airplane, Americans will now have to go through new full-body scanners that reveal every detail of our exposed bodies to airport security officials. #5) If that wasn't bad enough, the Transportation Security Administration has announced that airport screeners will begin roving through airports randomly taking chemical swabs from passengers and their bags to check for explosives. #6) Starting this upcoming December, some passengers on Canadian airlines flying to, from or even over the United States without ever landing there, will only be allowed to board their flights once the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has determined they are not terrorists. #7) Organic milk is such a threat that the FDA has been conducting military style raids on Amish farmers in Pennsylvania. # An NYPD officer has broken his silence and has confessed that innocent citizens are being set up and falsely arrested and ticketed in order to meet quotas. #9) A growing number of police departments across the U.S. are turning to mobile camera systems in order to fight motor vehicle theft and identify unregistered cars. #10) For decades, Arizona has been known as "the sunset state", but lately many frustrated residents have started calling it "the surveillance state". #11) Judges and police in Florida have been caught using on tickets in the state of Florida. #12) An extensive investigation has revealed that between 2003 and 2007, that state of Texas quietly gave hundreds of newborn baby blood samples to a U.S. Armed Forces laboratory for use in a forensics database. #13) A 6-year-old girl was recently handcuffed and sent to a mental facility after throwing temper tantrums at her elementary school. #14) One 12-year-old girl in New York was recently arrested and marched out of her school in handcuffs just because she doodled on her desk. #15) In Florida, students have been arrested by police for things as simple as bringing a plastic butter knife to school, throwing an eraser, and drawing a picture of a gun. #16) When a mother on a flight to Denver spanked both of her children and cussed out a flight attendant who tried to intervene, she suddenly found herself handcuffed and headed for prison. Why? She was charged with being a domestic terrorist under the Patriot Act. #17) A new global treaty may force U.S. Internet service providers to spy on what you do online. #18) A leaked Obama administration memo has revealed plans for the federal government to seize more than 10 million acres of land from Montana to New Mexico. #19) 56 percent of Americans questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll said that the U.S. government has become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens. #20) But one other recent poll found that 51 percent of Americans agree with this statement: "It is necessary to give up some civil liberties in order to make the country safe from terrorism." http://thisistheendoftheworldaswekno...r-police-state US is police state: Homeland Security Unveils Mobile Mind Screening Checkpoints That country is turning in to one big jail... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNXig2uJ-NM

American Capitis Diminutio Rights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C96wq...eature=related Beat the Banks and the Debt Collectors, totally Lawfully (All 4 parts): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKXK-...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHaZP...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDdF...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTyIddmmB5E Get Out Of Debt Free (All 3 parts):

American Capitis Diminutio Rights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C96wq...eature=related Beat the Banks and the Debt Collectors, totally Lawfully (All 4 parts): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKXK-...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHaZP...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDdF...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTyIddmmB5E Get Out Of Debt Free (All 3 parts):

DISCLAIMER THIS IS A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC COMMUNICATION Nothing contained within this THREAD should be construed as legal advice. I'm just sharing some of my experiences with like-minded people that have an interest in this topic. If you need legal advice, contact a competent attorney, if there is such a thing. Good luck to you, How to get out of Debt (the simple DIY Method) Whenever you receive a demand for payment from a Bank, Building Society, or Loan Company, all you need to do is to respond correctly, the drift of which is to request them to provide three things: 1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting), and 2. Verification of their claim against you (a sworn affidavit or even just a signed invoice - signed is important!), and 3. A copy of the contract binding both parties. Write to say you would be happy to pay any financial obligation you might lawfully (important word!) owe as soon as these three documents are received. They can't validate the debt because they never sustained a loss. They can't verify any claim against you - as a flesh and blood human being with a living soul - they will be attempting to talk to your legal fiction NAME. They can't produce a copy of the contract because a lawfully binding one doesn't exist. What exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract. What they refer to as 'your contract with us' is not a valid, bilateral, agreement - since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the Credit Card (or whatever) 'application', namely: 1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are actually creating the credit with our signature), and 2. Equal Consideration. They bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose. ("Consideration" means 'something of value', e.g. money, or an item of value - something they are trading for your signature/promise - something they have to lose), and 3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based upon fraud), and 4. Signatures of BOTH Parties/Meeting of the Minds (Corporations can't sign because they have no Right, or Mind, to contract, because they are soulless legal fictions) Credit Cards and Loans are win/win for them, and lose/lose for everyone else - it is the slickest con game on the planet. But you have to know, and realise all this. If you don't they will steamroller you. They will try every trick in the book, because it is their life-blood. Stick to your guns. ENSURE THAT EVERY LETTER YOU SEND CLEARLY STATES "Without Prejudice", which means that you reserve all Rights in law, and yield to no contract unless it is lawful by virtue meeting the four conditions above. Conditions (1) and (2) can never be met. Simply because they never have any money to lend in the first place. Banks are not allowed, by law, to lend any Depositor's money. Loan Companies do not have any Deposits anyway. Therefore they can only ever lend what you gave to them in the first place, based on your signature on the Loan Application. THEY LEND BACK TO YOU - WHAT YOU GAVE TO THEM - VIA YOUR SIGNATURE/PROMISE! They will get the message, because they know they are operating fraudulently. If you do (somehow) end up in court You will be asked your name, or whether you name is <whatever> … e.g. Veronica Chapman. The correct reply is "If I tell you my name, will I have a contract with you?" If the answer is "No", then you say "I'm a flesh and blood human being, with a living soul, and commonly called Veronica" (Obviously substitute your own Given Name - or use mine which would constitute a fraud … your choice). If they continue to use your legal fiction NAME (e.g. 'Ms. Chapman'), do your best to ignore it, until they make it clear they are addressing you, and then repeat "I'm sorry, were you addressing me? I'm commonly called <whatever>". If the answer is "Yes" then you can say "Then you need to provide me with FULL DISCLOSURE, some CONSIDERATION, the LAWFUL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, and we would both need to SIGN. Is that not so?". Either way, you would be seriously looking at "Case Dismissed"! If they threatened 'Contempt of Court' (a trick they often use), then the response is "Is that CIVIL or CRIMINAL contempt?". DO NOT SAY ANYTHING ELSE UNTIL YOU RECEIVE AN ANSWER. (Do not be sucked into filling in 'empty silence'). If the answer is "Criminal", then the response is "Who makes the CLAIM, what is the CRIME, and who is the INJURED PARTY?". If they say "The COURT makes the CLAIM", the response is "You know that the court is not a human being, and that only human beings, blessed with a living soul, can make a CLAIM!". If the answer is "Civil", then the response is "Please explain the CONTRACT. Will you provide FULL DISCLOSURE, what is the CONSIDERATION, and will you provide the SIGNATURE of a human being with a living soul?" There are other things you can say to them that will nullify their pretentious ways, the ones outlined above are just one approach.

DISCLAIMER THIS IS A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC COMMUNICATION Nothing contained within this THREAD should be construed as legal advice. I'm just sharing some of my experiences with like-minded people that have an interest in this topic. If you need legal advice, contact a competent attorney, if there is such a thing. Good luck to you, How to get out of Debt (the simple DIY Method) Whenever you receive a demand for payment from a Bank, Building Society, or Loan Company, all you need to do is to respond correctly, the drift of which is to request them to provide three things: 1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting), and 2. Verification of their claim against you (a sworn affidavit or even just a signed invoice - signed is important!), and 3. A copy of the contract binding both parties. Write to say you would be happy to pay any financial obligation you might lawfully (important word!) owe as soon as these three documents are received. They can't validate the debt because they never sustained a loss. They can't verify any claim against you - as a flesh and blood human being with a living soul - they will be attempting to talk to your legal fiction NAME. They can't produce a copy of the contract because a lawfully binding one doesn't exist. What exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract. What they refer to as 'your contract with us' is not a valid, bilateral, agreement - since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the Credit Card (or whatever) 'application', namely: 1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are actually creating the credit with our signature), and 2. Equal Consideration. They bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose. ("Consideration" means 'something of value', e.g. money, or an item of value - something they are trading for your signature/promise - something they have to lose), and 3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based upon fraud), and 4. Signatures of BOTH Parties/Meeting of the Minds (Corporations can't sign because they have no Right, or Mind, to contract, because they are soulless legal fictions) Credit Cards and Loans are win/win for them, and lose/lose for everyone else - it is the slickest con game on the planet. But you have to know, and realise all this. If you don't they will steamroller you. They will try every trick in the book, because it is their life-blood. Stick to your guns. ENSURE THAT EVERY LETTER YOU SEND CLEARLY STATES "Without Prejudice", which means that you reserve all Rights in law, and yield to no contract unless it is lawful by virtue meeting the four conditions above. Conditions (1) and (2) can never be met. Simply because they never have any money to lend in the first place. Banks are not allowed, by law, to lend any Depositor's money. Loan Companies do not have any Deposits anyway. Therefore they can only ever lend what you gave to them in the first place, based on your signature on the Loan Application. THEY LEND BACK TO YOU - WHAT YOU GAVE TO THEM - VIA YOUR SIGNATURE/PROMISE! They will get the message, because they know they are operating fraudulently. If you do (somehow) end up in court You will be asked your name, or whether you name is <whatever> … e.g. Veronica Chapman. The correct reply is "If I tell you my name, will I have a contract with you?" If the answer is "No", then you say "I'm a flesh and blood human being, with a living soul, and commonly called Veronica" (Obviously substitute your own Given Name - or use mine which would constitute a fraud … your choice). If they continue to use your legal fiction NAME (e.g. 'Ms. Chapman'), do your best to ignore it, until they make it clear they are addressing you, and then repeat "I'm sorry, were you addressing me? I'm commonly called <whatever>". If the answer is "Yes" then you can say "Then you need to provide me with FULL DISCLOSURE, some CONSIDERATION, the LAWFUL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, and we would both need to SIGN. Is that not so?". Either way, you would be seriously looking at "Case Dismissed"! If they threatened 'Contempt of Court' (a trick they often use), then the response is "Is that CIVIL or CRIMINAL contempt?". DO NOT SAY ANYTHING ELSE UNTIL YOU RECEIVE AN ANSWER. (Do not be sucked into filling in 'empty silence'). If the answer is "Criminal", then the response is "Who makes the CLAIM, what is the CRIME, and who is the INJURED PARTY?". If they say "The COURT makes the CLAIM", the response is "You know that the court is not a human being, and that only human beings, blessed with a living soul, can make a CLAIM!". If the answer is "Civil", then the response is "Please explain the CONTRACT. Will you provide FULL DISCLOSURE, what is the CONSIDERATION, and will you provide the SIGNATURE of a human being with a living soul?" There are other things you can say to them that will nullify their pretentious ways, the ones outlined above are just one approach. __________________

The following is universal, it applies to most all countries. Here's how the Loans Scam works (And why you should NEVER feel sorry for Banks and so on) (Based on the work of Robert-Arthur: Menard, Mary-Elizabeth: Croft and (to some extent Winston Shrout and Irene-Maus: Gravenhorst), and John R. Dempsey of Sovereign Trust. I've just tried to reduce it to absolute fundamentals) 1) Banks: They take deposits. These are held in trust for the depositor. They must, by law, always be prepared to return any and all deposits back to depositors on demand. That's the LAW. They would not be able to do that if they were ever to lend out any money on deposit to anyone requesting a loan. They cannot, therefore, lend or invest anything entrusted to them. So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you? 2) Loan Companies, Credit Card Companies, Building Societies: They don't take deposit money anyway (I'm talking about the 'older version' of Building Societies before they became banks. I'm referring to the way they would just issue mortgages. Their 'banking' activities are controlled as in (1), above). So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you as a mortgage? Leave that question pending for a moment. 3) What is a cheque? Paper, printing ink, somewhere you can hand-write a Payee, and Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature. 4) What is a Loan Application/Agreement? Paper, printing ink, somewhere a Payee will be written (the name of the Loan Company), somewhere for an Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature. Do you see any similarity between (3) & (4)? A Loan Agreement is a cheque. (Cheques can be written on anything ... even toilet paper ... provided it contains the essential information so as to enable correct clearance processing) You send off the Loan Agreement to the Loan Company ... and they CASH YOUR CHEQUE! They cash it with an organisation that has the power to issue 'money' for that purpose (for example the Treasury, or the Bank of England, etc) NOW THEY HAVE THE MONEY, IN CASH, TO LEND TO YOU! Simple. Wasn't it? But wait! Sure, they provided the 'service' of converting your cheque into funds within an account you can drawn upon (write other cheques against, use a Credit Card against, etc). And they could do that because they knew how to do that. And yes, that was a service. And yes, they should be paid a fee for that service. But wait again! What is their 'fee'? Their 'servicing fee'? Oh ... only THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF YOUR ORIGINAL CHEQUE, PLUS INTEREST! That's all they ask for .. in order to provide the original service! How to do they ensure they collect this 'service fee'. By giving you a Payment Book! And they make sure they cream off the INTEREST, before applying the remainder as PAYMENT. In fact they even cajole you into never-ending INTEREST by specifying a minimum payment equal to the INTEREST they want. (Knowing full well you'll often opt for that, thereby allowing them to roll the whole thing on endlessly) Now let's view this another way. If you write a cheque for £100, and send it to someone else (the Payee), and they cash it - DO YOU EXPECT THE BANK TO DEDUCT ANOTHER £100 PLUS INTEREST - FOR ITSELF - AS WELL? No? You don't when you write a cheque you 'see' as a cheque do you? Well, then, why should they do that just because you can't 'see' a Loan Agreement as the cheque it actually is? MONEY IS CREATED WHEN YOU SIGN A PIECE OF PAPER AGREEING TO PAY. AND THAT'S THE ONLY WAY MONEY IS -EVER- CREATED. Your 'promise to pay' creates money. Yours, and everyone else's. So what -should- happen, then? What should happen is that you write out a cheque - promising to pay - and send it to the Treasury yourself. They would then 'cash' it (in the same way they do that for a Bank), by updating an account with the amount you specified, from which you can draw funds as you need them. That's it. Your 'promise to pay' stands until the end of time. That's all money is. A 'promise to pay', which stands until the end of time. All money. "All thee bits of it". http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M68GeL8PafE Check out a Banknote. What does it say? "I promise to pay the Bearer on demand the sum of so-many-pounds". And signed by the Governor of the Bank of England (in the UK). A banknote is a Promissory Note - just like a cheque or Loan Agreement or any other IOU. An IOU that stands until the end of time. What should a Bank do? It should simply accept the 'cash' from the Treasury, and operate the account for you. And claim a reasonable - SMALL - fee for providing you with this convenience. If you agree to some of your funds being invested, the bank should deduct their fees as commission, and not bother you with any other 'charges' at all. THIS IS WHERE WE NEED TO GET TO. To be able to convert your SIGNATURE directly, without any Bank or Loan Company intervening. And now for something completely different When you sent them your cheque (aka Loan Agreement) and they cashed it, they could have just walked away with your money. If they'd done that, you wouldn't have known any difference. They could have just written to you and said "Sorry, we didn't approve this loan, after all" You would have been miffed at not getting the loan but, on the other hand, slightly relieved you didn't have the payments hanging over you, believing that the whole thing was 'dead'. Dead? They were 'up' by the amount of the loan! And you were empty-handed! And you had given them that amount! Dead? I should cocoa! No. They are greedy, greedy, greedy, greedy. They want INTEREST. Never-ending INTEREST. They POSITIVELY HATE IT when you pay off a loan. Have you noticed? Try getting a loan, and then paying it back immediately. TRY IT. No. They can lend you your own money, and then claim it back PLUS INTEREST, if they don't just walk away. That's why they don't just walk away. Every loan taken out generates money for them. Generated by your payments back. That's where banks (etc.) get their money from. All they need to do is to make as sure as possible you've fallen for this SCAM sufficient times in the past, so as to be pretty sure you'll fall for it again. If you 'default' on payments, they had ALREADY BEEN PAID IN FULL RIGHT AT THE START. They took the risk with it. Exactly the same risk as when they invest anywhere. If prices go down, they simply lose, write off the experience, and try elsewhere. Do they send bailiffs if 'prices go down'? Err ... no. They 'involve' themselves when (as explained above) they have no need to be. The risks of doing so are, therefore, entirely theirs, and consequently there is absolutely no need to feel sorry for them. YOU, on the other hand, don't owe ANYTHING to ANYONE. What YOU did was to 'make some money' - and then spend it the way you wanted to spend it. And why not? 'Money was made' by you SIGNING a cheque and thereby 'promising to pay'. I repeat, that's the only way 'money is ever made'. They were the ones who jammed their oar into that simple mechanism. And now for something that gets really silly Mortgages. The method for obtaining the cash amount is the same as described above. But there is more to mortgages that meet the eye. (More, over and above, straight loans). Here a property, in the form of a dwelling, is being transferred from one owner to another (actually one keeper to another, not owner, but that's another subject). Now, it is illegal to mortgage a property you don't own. The property is considered to be the security on the loan. How can you be providing 'security' when you don't - at that time - actually own the thing? And, secondly, it is illegal to transfer a property/dwelling that has not yet been paid for. So ... what does this mean? You can't establish a loan, because you don't have any security to offer. Therefore you can't pay for it, because you can't get the loan money. (Err ... no. You can't offer you current home as security, because you are probably in the process of selling it!) And, since you can't pay for it, the Seller can't transfer it into your name. But ... on the other hand ... people can and do establish mortgages, do buy homes, and do move house. How is this done? Well ... it happens by 'magic'. The Bank/Building Society uses 'magic'. Not really paranormal 'magic', of course ... more akin to fraud, in actual fact. John Dempsey, of Sovereign Trust, explains in absolute detail how the Magic Bank operates: http://www.freewebs.com/debtfreesovereign/ (Sovereign Trust, btw, don't employ any form of magic/fraud. They do it honestly, openly, candidly, and all above board)

The following is universal, it applies to most all countries. Here's how the Loans Scam works (And why you should NEVER feel sorry for Banks and so on) (Based on the work of Robert-Arthur: Menard, Mary-Elizabeth: Croft and (to some extent Winston Shrout and Irene-Maus: Gravenhorst), and John R. Dempsey of Sovereign Trust. I've just tried to reduce it to absolute fundamentals) 1) Banks: They take deposits. These are held in trust for the depositor. They must, by law, always be prepared to return any and all deposits back to depositors on demand. That's the LAW. They would not be able to do that if they were ever to lend out any money on deposit to anyone requesting a loan. They cannot, therefore, lend or invest anything entrusted to them. So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you? 2) Loan Companies, Credit Card Companies, Building Societies: They don't take deposit money anyway (I'm talking about the 'older version' of Building Societies before they became banks. I'm referring to the way they would just issue mortgages. Their 'banking' activities are controlled as in (1), above). So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you as a mortgage? Leave that question pending for a moment. 3) What is a cheque? Paper, printing ink, somewhere you can hand-write a Payee, and Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature. 4) What is a Loan Application/Agreement? Paper, printing ink, somewhere a Payee will be written (the name of the Loan Company), somewhere for an Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature. Do you see any similarity between (3) & (4)? A Loan Agreement is a cheque. (Cheques can be written on anything ... even toilet paper ... provided it contains the essential information so as to enable correct clearance processing) You send off the Loan Agreement to the Loan Company ... and they CASH YOUR CHEQUE! They cash it with an organisation that has the power to issue 'money' for that purpose (for example the Treasury, or the Bank of England, etc) NOW THEY HAVE THE MONEY, IN CASH, TO LEND TO YOU! Simple. Wasn't it? But wait! Sure, they provided the 'service' of converting your cheque into funds within an account you can drawn upon (write other cheques against, use a Credit Card against, etc). And they could do that because they knew how to do that. And yes, that was a service. And yes, they should be paid a fee for that service. But wait again! What is their 'fee'? Their 'servicing fee'? Oh ... only THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF YOUR ORIGINAL CHEQUE, PLUS INTEREST! That's all they ask for .. in order to provide the original service! How to do they ensure they collect this 'service fee'. By giving you a Payment Book! And they make sure they cream off the INTEREST, before applying the remainder as PAYMENT. In fact they even cajole you into never-ending INTEREST by specifying a minimum payment equal to the INTEREST they want. (Knowing full well you'll often opt for that, thereby allowing them to roll the whole thing on endlessly) Now let's view this another way. If you write a cheque for £100, and send it to someone else (the Payee), and they cash it - DO YOU EXPECT THE BANK TO DEDUCT ANOTHER £100 PLUS INTEREST - FOR ITSELF - AS WELL? No? You don't when you write a cheque you 'see' as a cheque do you? Well, then, why should they do that just because you can't 'see' a Loan Agreement as the cheque it actually is? MONEY IS CREATED WHEN YOU SIGN A PIECE OF PAPER AGREEING TO PAY. AND THAT'S THE ONLY WAY MONEY IS -EVER- CREATED. Your 'promise to pay' creates money. Yours, and everyone else's. So what -should- happen, then? What should happen is that you write out a cheque - promising to pay - and send it to the Treasury yourself. They would then 'cash' it (in the same way they do that for a Bank), by updating an account with the amount you specified, from which you can draw funds as you need them. That's it. Your 'promise to pay' stands until the end of time. That's all money is. A 'promise to pay', which stands until the end of time. All money. "All thee bits of it". http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M68GeL8PafE Check out a Banknote. What does it say? "I promise to pay the Bearer on demand the sum of so-many-pounds". And signed by the Governor of the Bank of England (in the UK). A banknote is a Promissory Note - just like a cheque or Loan Agreement or any other IOU. An IOU that stands until the end of time. What should a Bank do? It should simply accept the 'cash' from the Treasury, and operate the account for you. And claim a reasonable - SMALL - fee for providing you with this convenience. If you agree to some of your funds being invested, the bank should deduct their fees as commission, and not bother you with any other 'charges' at all. THIS IS WHERE WE NEED TO GET TO. To be able to convert your SIGNATURE directly, without any Bank or Loan Company intervening. And now for something completely different When you sent them your cheque (aka Loan Agreement) and they cashed it, they could have just walked away with your money. If they'd done that, you wouldn't have known any difference. They could have just written to you and said "Sorry, we didn't approve this loan, after all" You would have been miffed at not getting the loan but, on the other hand, slightly relieved you didn't have the payments hanging over you, believing that the whole thing was 'dead'. Dead? They were 'up' by the amount of the loan! And you were empty-handed! And you had given them that amount! Dead? I should cocoa! No. They are greedy, greedy, greedy, greedy. They want INTEREST. Never-ending INTEREST. They POSITIVELY HATE IT when you pay off a loan. Have you noticed? Try getting a loan, and then paying it back immediately. TRY IT. No. They can lend you your own money, and then claim it back PLUS INTEREST, if they don't just walk away. That's why they don't just walk away. Every loan taken out generates money for them. Generated by your payments back. That's where banks (etc.) get their money from. All they need to do is to make as sure as possible you've fallen for this SCAM sufficient times in the past, so as to be pretty sure you'll fall for it again. If you 'default' on payments, they had ALREADY BEEN PAID IN FULL RIGHT AT THE START. They took the risk with it. Exactly the same risk as when they invest anywhere. If prices go down, they simply lose, write off the experience, and try elsewhere. Do they send bailiffs if 'prices go down'? Err ... no. They 'involve' themselves when (as explained above) they have no need to be. The risks of doing so are, therefore, entirely theirs, and consequently there is absolutely no need to feel sorry for them. YOU, on the other hand, don't owe ANYTHING to ANYONE. What YOU did was to 'make some money' - and then spend it the way you wanted to spend it. And why not? 'Money was made' by you SIGNING a cheque and thereby 'promising to pay'. I repeat, that's the only way 'money is ever made'. They were the ones who jammed their oar into that simple mechanism. And now for something that gets really silly Mortgages. The method for obtaining the cash amount is the same as described above. But there is more to mortgages that meet the eye. (More, over and above, straight loans). Here a property, in the form of a dwelling, is being transferred from one owner to another (actually one keeper to another, not owner, but that's another subject). Now, it is illegal to mortgage a property you don't own. The property is considered to be the security on the loan. How can you be providing 'security' when you don't - at that time - actually own the thing? And, secondly, it is illegal to transfer a property/dwelling that has not yet been paid for. So ... what does this mean? You can't establish a loan, because you don't have any security to offer. Therefore you can't pay for it, because you can't get the loan money. (Err ... no. You can't offer you current home as security, because you are probably in the process of selling it!) And, since you can't pay for it, the Seller can't transfer it into your name. But ... on the other hand ... people can and do establish mortgages, do buy homes, and do move house. How is this done? Well ... it happens by 'magic'. The Bank/Building Society uses 'magic'. Not really paranormal 'magic', of course ... more akin to fraud, in actual fact. John Dempsey, of Sovereign Trust, explains in absolute detail how the Magic Bank operates: http://www.freewebs.com/debtfreesovereign/ (Sovereign Trust, btw, don't employ any form of magic/fraud. They do it honestly, openly, candidly, and all above board)

In The Beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth... And evil people created Persons. The word Person comes from the Latin word Persona, which means mask. A Person is a fiction entity in an imaginary world. It does not and can not exist in the real world, w here you and I live. A PERSON has 2 attributes, both of which are hearsay, which are a Name and a Birth Date. Law books have skewed the definition to include corporations as being a Person, is the crux of the Fraud and the truth of the illusion. A Corporation can not be a living m an m ale or fem ale created by God. A hum an being is not a living m an m ale/fem ale created by God, hum an means Color of m an and thus is not the species of m an of God. Corporations exist in an imaginary world, we God do not. The idea of there being natural or artificial Persons in relation to a living man male of God is a fraud for a Natural Person is a person, thus a fiction with some fictional attributes. It is also important to note that a m an created m ale or fem ale by God is only a reference point from the King Jam es Bible, in terms of LAW franchised from the BAR in THE CITY OF LONDON this is the best way to describe ourselves in relation to that fraud, for they m ake use of the King James Bible, although it is truly the Torah and the Talmud, but we’ll get into that later.

Sir Christopher please take your time with these clips they are very interesting... John Harris - It's an illusion Part 1/5

Sir Christopher Take a look at this clips. Very interesting trust me... John Harris - It's an illusion Part 1/5

The other factor involved here is that the world revolves on Commerce. Commerce is a form of warfare, thus love is not possible within Commerce only winners and losers. This game called Commerce is played in an imaginary world, thus the people who created the scheme benefit the most as they control the money. More exactly they can print as much money as they want too to achieve outcomes that are good for them and bad for us, remember this is a war that is going on and it is being raged against innocence and man created male and female by God. On a spiritual and physical level they somehow may think that they can wash their hands of the enormity of the crimes that they are committing because it all takes place within a fictional world and the dumb people are falling for the trickery. Once you begin to open your eyes to how this war is being played out, it becomes easier to stick your head in the sand rather than watch the horrific calculated battles taking place on a daily basis. However if we are ever going to be free we many of us to be leaders and begin saying no to their games until there are no games. When we say no there is no game, no more war.

In The Beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth... And evil people created Persons. The word Person comes from the Latin word Persona, which means mask. A Person is a fiction entity in an imaginary world. It does not and can not exist in the real world, w here you and I live. A PERSON has 2 attributes, both of which are hearsay, which are a Name and a Birth Date. Law books have skewed the definition to include corporations as being a Person, is the crux of the Fraud and the truth of the illusion. A Corporation can not be a living m an m ale or fem ale created by God. A hum an being is not a living m an m ale/fem ale created by God, hum an means Color of m an and thus is not the species of m an of God. Corporations exist in an imaginary world, we God do not. The idea of there being natural or artificial Persons in relation to a living man male of God is a fraud for a Natural Person is a person, thus a fiction with some fictional attributes. It is also important to note that a m an created m ale or fem ale by God is only a reference point from the King Jam es Bible, in terms of LAW franchised from the BAR in THE CITY OF LONDON this is the best way to describe ourselves in relation to that fraud, for they m ake use of the King James Bible, although it is truly the Torah and the Talmud, but we’ll get into that later.

Christopher oni neriagiryut potamychto nad nimi rabotauyt serioznie organizatsii po promivanuy mozgov kak Tavistok Institute etd... etd... They create your reality and sell it to you trough media and other outlets of mass mind control...

Sir Christopher eti knizhki nyzhno obezatelno prochetats... How the world game of economics really works - watch this video for the basics... http://sovereign-souverain.blogspot.com/20...-game_1232.html Hazardous Material - How it all works http://www.scribd.com/doc/26415787/Hazardo...ow-it-all-works The Babalonian Woe http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/the...ylonian_woe.pdf

Sir Christopher ya eto davno znauy... Izachauy eto vso kak minimym desats let... Osnovnaya massi lydei sploshnie ovsti leshini svobodno mislits....

Dami i Gospoda ochen sovetyu vam vsem prochetats ety knizhky... The Extortion SYSTEM of the Ruling Elite by...Francis Robert Thomas Hay http://freedomfiles.org/extortion.pdf