crimson

нет, не всё, Артур... бесмысленны и беспочвенны твои обвинения в том что я к примеру пытаюсь унизит веру. Можешь докажи, нет, извинись... вот и все дела. А словами бросаться все горазды.

наверное всё-таки необходимо внести пункт который говорит что до того как делать бессмысленные заявления всем юзерам, модерам и админам необходимо попытаться прочесть то что написано другими

вот нашёл ещё в тему, на этот за по-русски Парламент Армении принял в третьем чтении законопроект о митингах и шествиях В третьем и окончательном чтении парламент Армении принял сегодня, представленный министерством юстиции, законопроект, регламентирующий проведение митингов, шествий и собраний. Отметим, что, представляя документ, министр юстиции Армении Давид Арутюнян отметил, что в нем нашли отображение 90% концептуальных предложений ОБСЕ. Проект закона был существенно доработан после первого чтения, в частности, была ограничена возможность проявления субъективности со стороны государственных и судебных органов при санкционировании подобного рода мероприятий. Сокращены также сроки предоставления разрешений и оспаривания отказа в проведении акций в суде, а также предусмотрена возможность предоставления полномочными органами альтернативного времени или места организации акции. Исключен также пункт о привлечении к ответственности участников акции, каковыми, в свою очередь, считаются не все присутсвующие на акции лица (журналисты, сотрудники правоохранительных структур и так далее). Согласно проекту закона, представители государственных органов или органов местного самоуправления привлекаются к уголовной или административной ответственности, если они незаконно препятствуют организации массовых акций. Организаторы и участники массовых акций также привлекаются к ответственности в случае нарушения положений этого документа. Массовые акции запрещается проводить вблизи (до 150 метров) от объектов особого назначения, государственного и стратегического значения, а также объектов, обеспечивающих жизнедеятельность населения, список которых устанавливает правительство. Под юрисдикцию данного законопроекта не подпадают акции, в которых участвуют менее 100 человек. Отметим также, что приостановка оборота в парламенте данного документа значилась в числе десяти требований армянской оппозиции. Именно невыполнение данного требования и стало, по словам оппозиционеров, одной из причин, по которой дальнейший диалог с властью стал нецелесообразен. Между тем, как отметил накануне спикер армянского парламента Артур Багдасарян, требование оппозиции о приостановке процесса обсуждения и принятия данного документа было выдвинуто тогда, когда уже он был принят в первом чтении и продвигался по заранее подписанному спикером календарю. Вместе с тем, спикер отметил, что оппозиция может в любой удобный для нее момент выступить с законодательной инициативой о внесении изменений и дополнений в уже принятый законопроект. http://www.regnum.ru/allnews/253861.html

Недавно при обсуждении темы о разгоне демонстрации оппозиции, здесь говорилось о том что в Армении нет закона неразрешающего проведение митингов и демонстраций, также как и то что по конституции нет понятия “несанкционированный митинг”, поскольку необходимым условием для проведения оного является уповещение мерии (нет необходимости согласия властей). Вот нашёл сегодня статью о том что такое положение дел возможно изменится. У кого есть более детальная информация об этом законопроекте, поделитесь пожалуйста. К сожалению Русская и Армянская версии статьи требуют пароль для доступа ПАРЛАМЕНТ АРМЕНИИ ПРИНЯЛ ВО ВТОРОМ ЧТЕНИИ ЗАКОНОПРОЕКТ "О ПОРЯДКЕ ПРОВЕДЕНИЯ СОБРАНИЙ, МИТИНГОВ, ШЕСТВИЙ И ДЕМОНСТРАЦИЙ" ArmenPress April 27 2004 PARLIAMENT APPROVES BILL ON MASS RALLIES IN SECOND READING YEREVAN, APRIL 27, ARMENPRESS: By a vote of 79 to 2 with no abstentions the parliament approved today in the second reading a government-developed bill "On procedures for holding meetings, rallies, marches and demonstrations." Presenting the bill on Monday justice minister David Harutunian said that the government had taken into account most of the proposals received from international organizations. In particular, the minister said, about 90 per cent of the notes made by the OSCE office in Yerevan were taken into consideration while preparing the bill for the second reading. However, on 22 April, the special representative of the secretary-general of the Council of Europe, Natalya Vutova, said that the bill "On procedures for holding meetings, rallies, marches and demonstrations" adopted by the Armenian National Assembly in the first reading did not correspond to Article 11 of the European convention on freedom of assembly. Vutova said this referring to the preliminary conclusion by the Council of Europe Venice Commission. The parliament also approved in the first reading a bill on making changes to the criminal code, which are supposed to eliminate a chain of technical shortcomings and omissions. The bill invalidates, particularly, a provision of the code which stipulated that convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for grave crimes did not have the right to seek pre-term release. http://groong.usc.edu/news/msg85824.html

да, правда только invitation letter, но не guarantee letter, надеюсь что и так прокатит

Our Best in Budapest?: Can Armenia's choice handle the environment of an international murder trial? ArmeniaNow.com April 23, 2004 Commentary by Naira Manucharova, ArmeniaNow Deputy Editor Political tension in Yerevan has shifted focus from the upcoming trial in Hungary in the death of Armenian Army Lieutenant Gurgen Markaryan. The slain officer was memorialized in Yerevan. Markaryan was murdered February 19 while attending a NATO "Partnership for Peace" conference in Budapest. Ramil Safarov, an officer in the Azerbaijan Army has been charged. Armenians were shocked by news of Markaryan's brutal murder, and were outraged by commentary in Baku that turned Safarov into a national hero. Funds have been established in Azerbaijan for Safarov's defense and he is regularly visited by countrymen concerned for his well being. Azeri politicians, lawyers, public figures and his country's ombudsman are manipulating pre-trial developments. His family receives money from a special fund established specifically for their purpose, called "Ramil Safarov Stipend". Meanwhile Markaryan's family is almost forgotten. Ombudsman Elmira Suleimanova has written to Hungarian officials "reminding" that Safarov is a victim of Armenian aggression. A chief rights advocate attached a document to the letter "concerning outrages committed by Armenian 'monsters' in Khojalu". One needn't peculiar insight to conclude that Azeri measures will aim at influencing a favorable outcome in Budapest. Nor should one doubt that neighbors to the east will be intent on a verdict that in effect indicts Armenia, while vindicating Safarov as a victim out to avenge his family's or nations death. Simply, in Budapest there is a murderer, witnesses, a weapon and, in a Yerevan grave, a victim. But what, without these extenuating conditions might be a routine trial, promises to be an extraordinary theater in which relations between two republics are examined. That the murder took place in NATO's very front yard and was neither an example of "peace" nor "partnership" does not inspire confidence for Armenia-Azeri collaboration in upcoming joint-operations; specifically, multi-national military training to take place in September in Azerbaijan. It is logical to presume that NATO might side with the aggrieved party in the hostility that not only escalated Armenian-Azeri hatred, but sullied NATO in the process. But there is no evidence of such a bias as, till now, only Azerbaijan's interest is obvious. Little is yet known as to how the Armenian side will protect its citizen's rights or its honor. About all that is known, is that Markaryan's rights will be defended by Yerevan attorney Nazeli Vardanyan. And about all that could be learned about Vardanyan, is that she specializes in environmental law. It would be unfair to judge the attorney's effectiveness before she's even had a chance to prove it. It is not unfair, however, for concerned citizens, aware that a country is on trial, to question why someone of her specialty has been appointed the task. Journalists who might want to tell the citizenry who this woman is, are rebuffed, as if her very identity represents national security. Vardanyan herself referred us to a committee of five lawyers who will be working with her on the case. Attempts to get information by those means were not unsuccessful, but were dismissive. There would be little reason for wanting to know the pedigree of an attorney, if this were merely a case of citizen against citizen. Clearly, though, it is not. At stake is the reputation of a republic, and the risk of courtroom rhetoric being perceived as national foreign policy. Don't, then, the people of Armenia deserve to know their representative has earned confidence? Why did the Armenian International Lawyers Union appoint an environmental attorney to manage a case that could have exceptional repercussions? More significantly, why did the State react indifferently to the appointment? Typically, secrecy is maintained during investigations. But this secrecy of defense is something new for Armenia. Ombudsman of Armenia Larisa Alaverdyan was asked whether Armenia, not to mention the rights of the victim, can adequately be represented by the State 's appointment to the case. "The upcoming court battles in Budapest will be too much for one lawyer, even if he or she is very talented and clever," Alaverdyan said. "I think there must be at least two lawyers and one expert on the issue of the Karabakh problem because it is clear that the Azeri side is going to use this incident for carrying out a public trial against Armenia and Karabakh. Besides, as I know Nazeli Vardanyan is not experienced enough in criminal cases, moreover, in cases where crime is loaded with political and interstate relations." Alaverdyan also says it is unacceptable that a second charge against Safarov - attempted murder on the life another officer, Hayk Makuchyan - has been completely neglected. The Ombudsman is of the opinion that the crime against the officers was premeditated and had far-reaching political goals. "Supporting proper representation of the Armenian side at the forthcoming trial is a responsibility and duty of the government," Alaverdyan says. Why, then, trust the task to an attorney who is respected as an "eco-jurist", but unknown in the field of criminal prosecution? In October of last year, Vardanyan attended an international conference on ecology, in Hungary. Can it possibly be that Markaryan's, and Armenia's representation was selected merely because she has a Hungarian stamp in her passport? Of course it seems absurd. But in the absence of information, we are left to speculate. No doubt, "environment" will have a role in the Budapest trial. It is likely to be an environment bristling with slander, innuendo and attacks on nationality from both sides. We hope, nonetheless, that Armenia's counsel has not been sent for her knowledge of enviro-law, but that she truly is a secret weapon, worthy of secrecy. For it is clear that our neighbors are sparing no effort and means preparing for trial in Budapest. Head of the World Azerbaijani Congress expressed readiness to hire the best lawyer in Europe for defending the "national hero". Notorious Azeri businessman Fizuli Mamedov (nicknamed Al Capone) has offered to finance all actions of defense. At the same time, Azerbaijan is providing the Hungarians with their peculiar history of the Karabakh conflict. What will be Armenia's answer? What will our government's mouthpiece be able to do for protecting legal successors of Gurgen Markaryan and, correspondingly, national dignity? We wonder. And worry. Days into preparation for the trial, the coalition of lawyers assisting Vardanyan complained they hadn't yet even received the Hungarian Criminal Code. They said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is late with translation. They also complained that Armenia's lead lawyer Vardanyan, did not even have a laptop computer or roaming services on her mobile phone - conditions that make communication a distraction if not an outright handicap. Internal concern over the latest opposition activity has shoved this internationally-significant trial down the list of priorities set in Yerevan. Among the many questions we have about the personnel charged with defending an officer's rights and a republic's name, none is more crucial than a question that lingers while others, too, are unanswered: Is this the best our government can do? And isn't it worth the attention of the public, even while Yerevan's attention is on political rumbling? http://groong.usc.edu/news/msg85842.html

Ну всё-таки время от времени он нас балует выходом в третий круг. Кстати играть он будет сегодня вечером, и соперник его Кратохвил. Как уже писал, Сако пока ни разу ему не проигрывал (а выиграл дважды). Кроме того через пару часов начнётся мач между Налбандяном и Мартином

Azat Artsakh - Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR) April 27 2004 NKR AND CYPRUS CONFLICTS HAVE DIFFERENT BASES Commenting on the recent announcement of the Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliev that official Baku may recognize the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus, NKR foreign minister Ashot Ghulian mentioned that "it is possible, it looks unexpected but in the sense of the contents there is nothing unexpected." According to the minister, the authorities of Azerbaijan once again proved their inconsistency in the process of settlement of the Karabakh conflict. "Ilham Aliev's statement obviously testifies that Azerbaijan does not exclude the use of dual standards," said Ashot Ghulian, "in his actions he is merely guided by the political conjuncture, once supporting the right of the Turk Cypriots for self-determination, on the other hand, denying the same right of the people of Nagorni Karabakh." Answering the question of possible resemblance of the problems of Cyprus and Karabakh, the head of the NKR Ministry of Foreign Affairs answered that the situation in North Cyprus and Nagorni Karabakh are completely different. According to him, from the aspect of their prehistory, origins, processes of settlement these conflicts have different bases and directions. At the same time Ashot Ghulian did not exclude that because of the extremely different approaches of the Karabakh conflict parties its settlement will last very long like in the case of Cyprus. "Our approach is the following; Nagorni Karabakh is interested in the rapid settlement of the problem because together with de jure recognition of NKR the rates of economic development of the republic will grow," said the minister of foreign affairs of NKR Ashot Ghulian.б AA

Николай, вы прекрасно знаете что ни то что Бог есть ни то что Бога нет доказать ни я ни вы ни кто либо иной не может. Более того вы уж должны были понять после 7-и месяцев общения со мной, что и я это прекрасно знаю. Так зачем такие предположения? Eстественно моя цель не в этом, да и вопрос я задавал не вам а Faither-y. Мне интересно что именно он вкладывает в формулировку “Бог - живая личность”. Вот мой вопрос к нему... если у вас есть ответ на этот вопрос, буду рад и вас выслушать.

Саргсян/Браах -- Волчков/Васке 6-3 7-6(3) В следующем туре Сако опять померяет силы с Блейком, на этот раз в парном разряде. Пара Блейк/Мерклейн вывела из борьбы посеянных под номером 4 Чешскую пару Пала/Степанек 6-3 6-3

А зачем нам профессионалы... нам и любители любимы

http://forum.hayastan.com/index.php?showtopic=7177

Вот статья о связи GPS и Relativity Theory: Full version here: http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~p.../Unit5/gps.html

Global Positioning System (as far as I know)

эту уже намного лучше

можно

то что абсолют недостижим (я не о водке )

da eto ponjatno armada-san, ja udivljajus' vozmuschennym golosam tex komu ne nravitsja chto ekspedicija turecko-amerikanskaja

что и у вас этот дурацкий I-Mode?

а что вы хотите, чтоб они нас пригласили? их территория, хотим мы того или не хотим, они и исследовать будут. Хотя... бред по-моему

то есть брАла или бралА?

я тут на подхвате если что :-"

Если он живая личность тогда его либо кто-то породил либо же кто-то создал. Так? И кто же если так?

С философской точки зрения несомненно, а о других точках зрения думать после обеда строго воспрещается

Ах как приятно послушать философские беседы на сытый желудок всё-таки Oбед это прекрасно, он так поднимает настроение и так кардинально уменьшает желание (и до обеда особо незначительное) делать что либо по работе